This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yoshimura, T. Articles by Ebihara, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yoshimura, T. Articles by Ebihara, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Differences in Circadian Photosensitivity between Retinally Degenerate CBA/J Mice (rd/rd) and Normal CBA/N Mice (+/+)

Department of Animal Physiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464, Japan

Miyuki Nishio

Department of Animal Physiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464, Japan

Maki Goto

Department of Animal Physiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464, Japan

Shizufumi Ebihara

Department of Animal Physiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464, Japan

Using the magnitude of phase shift of circadian locomotor rhythms induced by a single pulse of white fluorescent light, we compared the sensitivity of the circadian system to light in retinally degenerate mice and in normal mice. In the first experiment, phase response curves (PRCs) for 10- lux white light were generated in CBA/J mice with retinal degeneration (rd/rd) and CBA/N mice with normal retinas (+/+). Although large phase delays early in the subjective night and small phase advances in the late subjective night were observed in CBA/N mice, CBA/J mice showed only small phase delays early in the subjective night. In the second experiment, we found that the magnitude of phase shifts at circadian time (CT) 16 for delays and CT 24 for advances in CBA/J mice became larger with increasing light intensity, and that CBA/J mice could show the same amount of phase shift as CBA/N mice when higher intensities were used. These findings indicate that the differences in the shapes of PRCs are not due to differences in the nature of the oscillating system, but to differences in circadian photosensitivity between these strains. Because the genetic background for the rd loci was not completely identical in the CBA/N and CBA/J mice, it was possible that genes other than the rd gene might have caused different photosensitivity in these mice. Therefore, in the last experiment, we studied the circadian photosensitivity in F ₁ hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+/rd and rd/rd) obtained from the crossing between F₁ hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+ / rd and rd/rd ) obtained from the crossing between F₁ and CBA/J mice. In these mice with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds as well, mice with retinal degeneration were always less sensitive to light, suggesting that reduced circadian photosensitivity is caused by retinal degeneration. These results are discussed in relation to recent findings in retinally degenerate C57BL mice, which have been found to have normal circadian sensitivity to light.

Key Words: retinal degeneration • circadian rhythms • photosensitivity • CBA mice • phase response curve

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 9, No. 1, 51-60 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/074873049400900105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Yoshimura, Y. Yokota, A. Ishikawa, S. Yasuo, N. Hayashi, T. Suzuki, N. Okabayashi, T. Namikawa, and S. Ebihara Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Circadian Photosensitivity in Retinally Degenerate Mice J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2002; 17(6): 512 - 519. [Abstract] [PDF]