This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kliman, R. M. Articles by Lynch, G. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kliman, R. M. Articles by Lynch, G. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evidence for Independence of Circadian Characters and Extent of Photoresponsiveness in the Djungarian Hamster, Phodopus sungorus

Department of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459

G. Robert Lynch

Department of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459

Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) exposed to a short-day photoperiod generally respond with a syndrome of physiological and behavioral changes, such as body weight loss and molt to a white pelage. The extent of the short-day-induced responses differs among individuals. Furthermore, some hamsters show no photoresponse. In this study, we sought to determine whether variation in the photoresponse would be associated with circadian function; whether phase angle or free-running period () would differ between responsive and nonresponsive hamsters; and whether changes in these circadian characters would correlate with the extent of weight loss and molt (and the timing of molt onset) in photoresponsive hamsters.

Adult hamsters were kept in a short-day photoperiod (9 hr light, 15 hr dark) for 14 weeks, during which time body weight and molt were measured biweekly. Hamsters were then transferred to cages equipped with running wheels; we measured the phase angle of activity onset under a short-day photoperiod and in constant dark. Hamsters exhibiting a short-day-induced molt had a significantly shorter and a less negative phase angle than nonmolting animals. Hamsters that exhibited weight loss also had a significantly less negative phase angle, but no difference in . No significant Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients were found between extent (or timing) of the photoresponse and the circadian characters in responsive hamsters. Although these results indicate that threshold for photoresponsiveness is related to circadian function, the extent (and timing) of the photoresponse may not be.

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 6, No. 2, 159-166 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/074873049100600206


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. H. Bronson Are Humans Seasonally Photoperiodic? J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2004; 19(3): 180 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Majoy and P. D. Heideman Tau Differences between Short-Day Responsive and Short-Day Nonresponsive White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Do Not Affect Reproductive Photoresponsiveness J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2000; 15(6): 500 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Goldman, K. Dhandapani, and B. D. Goldman Genetic and Environmental Influences on Short-Day Responsiveness in Siberian Hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 2000; 15(5): 417 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Freeman and B. D. Goldman Photoperiod Nonresponsive Siberian Hamsters: Effect of Age on the Probability of Nonresponsiveness J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 1997; 12(2): 110 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]