This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meijer, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meijer, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Photoperiodic Control of Reproduction and Molt in the Kestrel, Falco tinnunculus

Zoological Laboratory, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, Haren, The Netherlands

An adaptive decline in average clutch size with progressive date of laying is char acteristic of most bird species with a single clutch of variable size per year. The effect of photoperiod on timing of laying, clutch size, and subsequent molt was investigated in kestrel pairs breeding and raising their young in captivity. In natural daylight (nLD), clutch size, under ad libitum feeding, showed the same decline with date as in nature. Birds breeding later also started molt later and molted faster (more feathers simultaneously), so that all birds completed molt more or less at the same time.

Constant long days (LD 17.5:6.5 and LD 13:11) from December 1 onward advanced both reproduction and molt. The LD 17.5:6.5 group developed the reproductive system faster, had a shorter courtship period, and laid eggs earlier than the LD 13:11 group. In both photoperiods there was a decrease in clutch size with progressive laying date, similar to that in nLD. Molt started in both groups at about the end of the laying period and slowed down in the longer photoperiod, especially in males. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) changes in the two pho toperiods were different for males and females. Males showed the expected slower LH re sponse in the shorter photoperiod, but the initial LH response by females was the same in both photoperiods. Data on LH, reproductive behavior, and body mass suggest that females have a wider annual reproductive window than males. Data on time of laying and number of eggs suggest that clutch size in the kestrel is determined by laying date itself, following an endog enous rhythm that is phase-locked to the reproductive cycle.

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 4, No. 3, 351-364 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/074873048900400304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Dawson Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2008; 363(1497): 1621 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]