Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biological Rhythms
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borbély, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tobler, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borbély, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tobler, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sleep Initiation and Initial Sleep Intensity: Interactions of Homeostatic and Circadian Mechanisms

Alexander A. Borbély

Institute of Pharmacology, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland

Peter Achermann

Institute of Pharmacology, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland

Lorenz Trachsel

Institute of Pharmacology, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland

Irene Tobler

Institute of Pharmacology, University of Zürich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland

Sleep initiation and sleep intensity in humans show a dissimilar time course. The propensity of sleep initiation (PSI), as measured by the multiple sleep latency test, remains at a relatively constant level throughout the habitual period of waking or exhibits a midafternoon peak. When waking is extended into the sleep period, PSI rises rapidly within a few hours. In contrast, sleep intensity, as measured by electroencephalographic slow-wave activity during naps, shows a gradual increase during the period of habitual waking. In the two-process model of sleep regulation, it corresponds to the rising limb of the homeostatic Process S. We propose that PSI is determined by the difference between Process S and the threshold H defining sleep onset, which is modulated by the circadian process C. In contrast to a previous version of the model, the parameters of H (amplitude, phase, skewness) differ from those of threshold L, which defines sleep termination. The present model is able to simulate the time course of PSI under baseline conditions as well as following recovery sleep after extended sleep deprivation. The simulations suggest that during the regular period of waking, a circadian process coun teracts the increasing sleep propensity induced by a homeostatic process. Data obtained in the rat indicate that during the circadian period of predominant waking, a circadian process prevents a major intrusion of sleep.

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 4, No. 2, 37-48 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/074873048900400205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?