This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beersma, D. G.M. Articles by Daan, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beersma, D. G.M. Articles by Daan, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Progression of Circadian Phase during Light Exposure in Animals and Humans

Department of Chronobiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, d.g.m.beersma{at}rug.nl

Marian Comas

Department of Chronobiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Roelof A. Hut

Department of Chronobiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Marijke C.M. Gordijn

Department of Chronobiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Melanie Rueger

Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Serge Daan

Department of Chronobiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Studies in humans and mice revealed that circadian phase shifting effects of light are larger at the beginning of a light exposure interval than during subsequent exposure. Little is known about the dynamics of this response reduction phenomenon. Here the authors propose a method to obtain information on the progression of phase during light exposure. Phase response curves to intervals of light exposure over a wide range in duration are available for flesh flies, mice, and humans. By comparing the phase shifts induced by pulses of various durations but starting at the same circadian phase, the progression of phase during a long interval (hours) of light exposure is reconstructed for each of these 3 species. For flies, the phase progression curves show that light pulses—if long enough— eventually make the pacemaker stabilize around InT18 (near subjective dusk), as is typical for strong resetting. The progression of phase toward the final value never shows advances larger than 7 h, while delays can be as large as 18 h. By applying the phase progression curve method presented in this study, differences between advances and delays in type-0 phase response curves can be distinguished clearly. In flesh flies (Sarcophaga) this bifurcation between delays and advance occurs when light exposure starts at InT0 (subjective midnight). The present study confirms earlier findings in mice showing that the beginning of the light pulse generates stronger phase shifts than subsequent hours of light. Response reduction is complete within 1 h of exposure. It is argued that the variation is not so much due to light adaptation processes, but rather to response saturation. In contrast to light adaptation, response saturation is fundamental to proper functioning of the circadian pacemaker during natural entrainment. For understanding entrainment of the pacemaker to natural light, phase progression curves in which naturalistic light profiles are applied could be an important tool.

Key Words: adaptation • saturation • fly • mouse • human

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 24, No. 2, 153-160 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0748730408330196


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?