Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biological Rhythms
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mistlberger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Landry, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mistlberger, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Landry, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Letter

Phenotyping Food Entrainment: Motion Sensors and Telemetry Are Equivalent

Ralph E. Mistlberger

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, mistlber{at}sfu.ca

Brianne A. Kent

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Glenn J. Landry

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Rats can anticipate a daily meal by entrainment of a circadian timekeeping mechanism that is anatomically separate from the light-entrainable circadian pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. The dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (DMH) has been claimed to be critical for the expression of circadian rhythms of food anticipatory activity, but efforts to confirm this finding have so far failed. Failure to confirm that DMH ablation disrupts or eliminates food anticipatory rhythms has been attributed to the use of overhead motion sensors rather than telemetry to measure locomotor activity. To examine the relationship between motion sensor and telemetric measures of locomotor activity, transponders were implanted into the peritoneal cavity of adult male rats, and activity was recorded continuously by both telemetry and infrared motion sensors. Activity counts were ~4 fold higher as detected by telemetry, but normalized activity patterns were virtually identical for the two measures during ad-lib food access, 4 h/day food restriction and total food deprivation after food restriction. Overhead motion sensors and telemetry are equivalent measures of food anticipatory activity in rats. Telemetry is an effective tool for continuous recording of body temperature but has no advantages over infrared motion sensors for measuring food anticipatory activity rhythms.

Key Words: circadian rhythms • locomotor activity • biotelemetry • food restriction • rat

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 24, No. 1, 95-98 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0748730408329573
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?