This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hut, R. A. Articles by Cooper, H. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hut, R. A. Articles by Cooper, H. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Photic Sensitivity Ranges of Hamster Pupillary and Circadian Phase Responses Do Not Overlap

INSERM, Bron, France, r.a.hut{at}rug.nl, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Department of Chronobiology, Bron, France, University of Lyon, France

Malgorzata Oklejewicz

INSERM, Bron, France, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Department of Chronobiology, Bron, France, University of Lyon, France

Camille Rieux

INSERM, Bron, France, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Department of Chronobiology, Bron, France, University of Lyon, France

Howard M. Cooper

INSERM, Bron, France, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Department of Chronobiology, Bron, France, University of Lyon, France

Mammalian retinal photoreceptors form an irradiance detection system that drives many nonvisual responses to light such as pupil reflex and resetting of the circadian clock. To understand the role of pupil size in circadian light responses, pupil diameter was pharmacologically manipulated and the effect on behavioral phase shifts at different irradiance levels was studied in the Syrian hamster. Dose-response curves for steady-state pupil size and for behavioral phase shifts were constructed for 3 pupil conditions (dilated, constricted, and control). Retinal irradiance was calculated from corneal irradiance, pupil size, retinal surface area, and absorption of ocular media. The sensitivity of photic responses to retinal irradiance is approximately 1.5 log units higher than to corneal irradiance. When plotted against corneal irradiance, pharmacological pupil constriction reduces the light sensitivity of the circadian system, but pupil dilation has no effect. As expected, when plotted against retinal irradiance all dose-response curves superimposed, confirming that the circadian system responds to photon flux on the retina. Pupil dilation does not increase the circadian response to increasing irradiance, since the response of the circadian system attains saturation at irradiance levels lower than those required to induce pupil constriction. The main finding shows that due to the different response sensitivities, the effect of pupil constriction on the light sensitivity of the circadian system in the hamster under natural conditions is virtually negligible. We further suggest the existence of distinct modulating mechanisms for the differential retinal irradiance sensitivity of the pupil system and the circadian system, which enables the different responses to be tuned to their specific tasks while using similar photoreceptive input.

Key Words: pupillary light reflex • circadian system • Syrian hamster • photoreception • photic system

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 23, No. 1, 37-48 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0748730407311851


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. G.M. Beersma, M. Comas, R. A. Hut, M. C.M. Gordijn, M. Rueger, and S. Daan The Progression of Circadian Phase during Light Exposure in Animals and Humans J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 2009; 24(2): 153 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Sletten, V. L. Revell, B. Middleton, K. A. Lederle, and D. J. Skene Age-Related Changes in Acute and Phase-Advancing Responses to Monochromatic Light J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2009; 24(1): 73 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]