This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evans, J. A. Articles by Gorman, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Evans, J. A. Articles by Gorman, M. R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Circadian Effects of Light No Brighter Than Moonlight

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychology, 0109, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA. 92093; e-mail: jaevans{at}ucsd.edu.

Jeffrey A. Elliott

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla

Michael R. Gorman

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla

In mammals, light entrains endogenous circadian pacemakers by inducing daily phase shifts via a photoreceptor mechanism recently discovered in retinal ganglion cells. Light that is comparable in intensity to moonlight is generally ineffective at inducing phase shifts or suppressing melatonin secretion, which has prompted the view that circadian photic sensitivity has been titrated so that the central pacemaker is unaffected by natural nighttime illumination. However, the authors have shown in several different entrainment paradigms that completely dark nights are not functionally equivalent to dimly lit nights, even when nighttime illumination is below putative thresholds for the circadian visual system. The present studies extend these findings. Dim illumination is shown here to be neither a strong zeitgeber, consistent with published fluence response curves, nor a potentiator of other zeitgebers. Nevertheless, dim light markedly alters the behavior of the free-running circadian pacemaker. Syrian hamsters were released from entrained conditions into constant darkness or dim narrowband green illumination (~0.01 lx, 1.3 x 10^-9 W/cm², peak = 560 nm). Relative to complete darkness, constant dim light lengthened the period by ~0.3 h and altered the waveform of circadian rhythmicity. Among animals transferred from long day lengths (14 L:10 D) into constant conditions, dim illumination increased the duration of the active phase () by ~3 h relative to complete darkness. Short day entrainment (8 L:16 D) produced initially long that increased further under constant dim light but decreased under complete darkness. In contrast, dim light pulses 2 h or longer produced effects on circadian phase and melatonin secretion that were small in magnitude. Furthermore, the amplitude of phase resetting to bright light and nonphotic stimuli was similar against dimly lit and dark backgrounds, indicating that the former does not directly amplify circadian inputs. Dim illumination markedly alters circadian waveform through effects on , suggesting that dim light influences the coupling between oscillators theorized to program the beginning and end of subjective night. Physiological mechanisms responsible for conveying dim light stimuli to the pacemaker and implications for chronotherapeutics warrant further study.

Key Words: dim light • circadian visual system • irradiance • constant conditions • phase shift • phase response curve • PRC

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?