This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goulet, G. Articles by Dumont, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goulet, G. Articles by Dumont, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Daily Light Exposure in Morning-Type and Evening-Type Individuals

Chronobiology Laboratory, Sacré-Cur Hospital of Montréal, Department of Psychology, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Valérie Mongrain

Chronobiology Laboratory, Sacré-Cur Hospital of Montréal, Department of Neurosciences, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Catherine Desrosiers

Chronobiology Laboratory, Sacré-Cur Hospital of Montréal

Jean Paquet

Chronobiology Laboratory, Sacré-Cur Hospital of Montréal

Marie Dumont

Chronobiology Laboratory, Sacré-Cur Hospital of Montréal, marie.dumont{at}umontreal.ca, Department of Neurosciences, Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

Morning-type individuals (M-types) have earlier sleep schedules than do evening types (E-types) and therefore differ in their exposure to the external light-dark cycle. M-types and E-types usually differ in their endogenous circadian phase as well, but whether this is the cause or the consequence of the difference in light exposure remains controversial. In this study, ambulatory monitoring was used to measure 24-h light exposure in M-type and E-type subjects for 7 consecutive days. The circadian phase of each subject was then estimated in the laboratory using the dim-light melatonin onset in saliva (DLMO) and the core body temperature minimum (Tmin). On average, M-types had earlier sleep schedules and earlier circadian phases than E-types. They also showed more minutes of daily bright light exposure (> 1000 lux) than E-types. As expected, the 24-h patterns of light exposure analyzed in relation to clock time indicated that M-types were exposed to more light in the morning than E-types and that the reverse was true in the late evening. However, there was no significant difference when the light profiles were analyzed in relation to circadian phase, suggesting that, on average, the circadian pacemaker of both M-types and E-types was similarly entrained to the light-dark cycle they usually experience. Some M-types and E-types had different sleep schedules but similar circadian phases. These subjects also had identical light profiles in relation to their circadian phase. By contrast, M-types and E-types with very early or very late circadian phases showed large differences in their profiles of light exposure in relation to their circadian phase. This observation suggests that in these individuals, early or late circadian phases are related to relatively short and long circadian periods and that a phase-delaying profile of light exposure in M-types and a phase-advancing profile in E-types are necessary to ensure a stable entrainment to the 24-h day.

Key Words: morningness-eveningness • chronotype • light exposure • circadian phase • circadian period • sleep schedule • ambulatory recordings • entrainment

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?