This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Monecke, S. Articles by Wollnik, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Monecke, S. Articles by Wollnik, F. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Asymmetric Control of Short Day Response in European Hamsters

Biological Institute, Department of Animal Physiology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany, smonecke{at}marlin.bio.umass.edu

André Malan

Department of Neurobiology of Rhythms, Institute for Cellular and Integrative Neurosciences (LC2), CNRS and University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France

Franziska Wollnik

Biological Institute, Department of Animal Physiology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany

The European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) is a circannual species in which the synchronization of the circannual cycle to the natural year occurs during 2 annual phases of sensitivity. Around the summer solstice, the animals are sensitive to a shortening of photoperiod. During this sensitive phase, pronounced changes in circadian output parameters are observed, indicating a different functional state of the circadian system. This special state is assumed to be necessary to develop the extreme sensitivity to short day length in European hamsters during this phase. In natural conditions, the animals are able to recognize the shortening of photoperiod already in mid-July, when the photoperiod is reduced only by 30 min. To investigate the short-day response in sensitive European hamsters on the basis of the 2-coupled oscillator model of Pittendrigh and Daan (1976), daily activity and the reproductive state of European hamsters were recorded after an asymmetrical reduction of photoperiod from long (LD 16:08) to short (LD 08:16) photoperiods. The activity pattern of the animals showed an immediate response to the short photoperiod at the day of transfer when the night was extended only into the evening, but there was a significant delay in the response time when the night was extended into the morning. Thus, the evening oscillator E is more important in inducing the photoperiodic response than the morning oscillator M. Moreover, the broad intragroup variation in the latter conditions strongly suggests that the changes in the activity pattern were endogenously induced and that the animals were not able to recognize a lengthening of the night into the morning. Gonadal regression started in both groups 3 weeks after the change in the activity pattern, indicating that this process is initiated when the circadian system has received the short-day signal either through changes in photoperiod or through the circannual clock.

Key Words: gonads • activity • circadian rhythms • E & M oscillator • photoperiod • seasonality

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 21, No. 4, 290-300 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0748730406290315


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?