This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Arendt, J. Articles by Luke, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arendt, J. Articles by Luke, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sleep and Circadian Phase in a Ship’s Crew

School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, arendtjo{at}aol.com, j.arendt{at}surrey.ac.uk

Benita Middleton

School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

Peter Williams

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

Gavin Francis

British Antarctic Survey Medical Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom

Claire Luke

School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

Numerous factors influence the increased health risks of seamen. This study investigated sleep (by actigraphy) and the adaptation of the internal clock in watch-keeping crew compared to day workers, as possible contributory factors. Fourteen watch keepers, 4 h on, 8 h off (0800-1200/2000-2400 h, 1200-1600/2400-0400 h, 1600-2000/0400-0800 h) (fixed schedule, n = 6; rotating by delay weekly, n = 8), and 12 day workers participated during a voyage from the United Kingdom to Antarctica. They kept daily sleep diaries and wore wrist monitors for continuous recording of activity. Sleep parameters were derived from activity using the manufacturer’s software and analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA using SAS 8.2. Sequential urine samples were collected for 48 h weekly for 6-sulphatoxymelatonin measurement as an index of circadian rhythm timing. Individuals working watches of 1200-1600/2400-0400 h and 1600-2000/0400-0800 h had 2 sleeps daily, analyzed separately as main sleep (longest) and 2nd sleep. Main sleep duration was shorter in watch keepers than in day workers (p < 0.0001). Objective sleep quality was significantly compromised in rotaters compared to both day workers and fixed watch keepers, the most striking comparisons being sleep efficiency (percentage desired sleep time spent sleeping) main sleep (p < 0.0001) and sleep fragmentation (an index of restlessness) main sleep (p < 0.0001). The 2nd sleep was substantially less efficient than was the main sleep (p < 0.0001) for all watch keepers. There were few significant differences in sleep between the different watches in rotating watch keepers. Circadian timing remained constant in day workers. Timing of the 6-sulphatoxymelatonin rhythm was later for the watch of 1200-1600/2400-0400 h than for all others (1200-1600/2400-0400 h, 5.90 ± 0.85 h; 1600-2000/0400-0800 h, 1.5 ± 0.64 h; 0800-1200/ 2000-2400 h, 2.72 ± 0.76 h; days, 2.09 ± 0.68 h [decimal hours, mean ± SEM]: ANOVA, p < 0.01). This study identifies weekly changes in watch time as a cause of poor sleep in watch keepers. The most likely mechanism is the inability of the internal clock to adapt rapidly to abrupt changes in schedule.

Key Words: sleep • shift work • melatonin • light • rhythm • watch keeping • crew

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 21, No. 3, 214-221 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0748730405285278


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?