This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paine, S.-J. Articles by Travier, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paine, S.-J. Articles by Travier, N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Epidemiology of Morningness/Eveningness: Influence of Age, Gender, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Factors in Adults (30-49 Years)

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Research School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand, s.j.paine{at}massey.ac.nz

Philippa H. Gander

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Research School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand

Noemie Travier

Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Centre for Public Health Research, Research School of Public Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand

The Horne and Ostberg Morningness/Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) is widely used to differentiate between morning and evening types, but there is very little epidemiological evidence about the distribution of MEQ chronotypes in the general population. The purpose of the present study was to simultaneously investigate the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and work factors on the distribution of morningness/eveningness. A New Zealand version of the MEQ was mailed to 5000 New Zealand adults, ages 30 to 49 years, who were randomly selected from the electoral rolls (55.7% response rate). A total of 2526 questionnaires were included in the analyses. According to the Horne and Ostberg classification, 49.8% of the total population was classified as morning type compared to 5.6% having an evening-type preference. However, using new cutoffs for middle-aged working adults described by Taillard et al. (2004), 24.7% of the population was morning type and 26.4% was evening type. After controlling for ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic deprivation, participants ages 30 to 34 years were more likely to be definitely evening type (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, p < 0.05) and less likely to be morning type (moderately morning type, OR = 0.59, p < 0.01, or definitely morning type, OR = 0.59, p < 0.05) compared to those ages 45 to 49 years. Work schedules were also important predictors of chronotype, with night workers more likely to be definitely evening type (OR = 1.49, p = 0.05) and the unemployed less likely to be moderately morning type (OR = 0.64, p < 0.05) compared to other workers. Evening types were 2.5 times more likely to report that their general health was only poor or fair compared to morning types (p < 0.01). This study confirms that the original criteria of Horne and Ostberg (1976) are not useful for classifying chronotypes in a middle-aged population. The authors conclude that morningness/eveningness preference is largely independent of ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic position, indicating that it is a stable characteristic that may be better explained by endogenous factors.

Key Words: morningness/eveningness • chronotype • epidemiology • age • ethnicity • gender • socioeconomic deprivation • work schedules

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. Brown, D. Kunz, A. Dumas, P. O. Westermark, K. Vanselow, A. Tilmann-Wahnschaffe, H. Herzel, and A. Kramer Molecular insights into human daily behavior PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1602 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Minerva BMJ, April 1, 2006; 332(7544): 802 - 802. [Full Text] [PDF]