Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biological Rhythms
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saiovici, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Follett, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saiovici, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Follett, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Rapid Photoperiodic Responses in Japanese Quail: Is Daylength Measurement Based upon a Circadian System?

Monica S. Saiovici

AFRC Research Group on Photoperiodism & Reproduction, Department of Zoology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom

Trevor J. Nicholls

AFRC Research Group on Photoperiodism & Reproduction, Department of Zoology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom

Brian K. Follett

AFRC Research Group on Photoperiodism & Reproduction, Department of Zoology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom

Experimental photoperiods, presented either once only or repeatedly, were used to assess the oscillatory and hourglass properties of the photoperiodic clock in Japanese quail. Gonadectomized quail on 8-hr daylengths respond to a single skeleton photoperiod consisting of two 8-hr light pulses separated by 2 hr of darkness (i.e., LDLD 8:2:8:6) with a marked increase in secretion rate of luteinizing hormone (LH). This response suggests that the second light pulse interacts with a "photoinducible phase" ({Phi}i) lying some 10-16 hr from "dawn" (start of the first light pulse). If, however, groups of quail maintained on 8-hr daylengths are transferred to continuous darkness (DD), and the position of the {Phi}i is sought by a single 8-hr light pulse applied at various times on the first or third day of DD, then an increase in circulating LH is, at best, barely detectable. It would appear that a strongly responsive {Phi}i does not recur rhythmically in DD. Instead, the light pulse apparently acts primarily as a "dawn" signal that triggers a single cycle of photoinducibility, since a second 8-hr light pulse, placed to begin 2 hr after the end of the first, induces a large increase in plasma LH. Similar results are obtained if any single 8-hr light pulse presented to animals held in darkness is preceded, 10 hr earlier, by a short "dawn" light signal. Such dawn signals can be effective when very short; a pulse of only 30 sec can cause a subsequent {Phi}i. The dawn pulse is effective at any circadian phase and leads to a single cycle in photoinducibility. In contrast, a much longer light pulse (perhaps not less than 4 hr) is needed to interact with {Phi}i if significant gonadotropin secretion is to be stimulated.

In confirmation of the findings described above, we found that Nanda-Hamner lighting schedules have remarkably little effect in stimulating gonadotropin secretion in gonadectomized quail. There is, for example, a very marked difference between the effectiveness of "resonating" schedules such as LD 6:6, which stimulates a high LH secretion rate since each "inductive" light pulse is preceded by an appropriate "dawn" signal, and a theoretically effective schedule such as LD 6:30, which induces a very small response by comparison. Such schedules (even theoretically noninductive ones) can, however, be made very highly inductive if alternate light pulses are preceded by an appropriately positioned 15-min light pulse to act as "dawn."

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 2, No. 2, 139-152 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/074873048700200205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
V. M. King, G. E. Bentley, and B. K. Follett
A Direct Comparison of Photoperiodic Time Measurement and the Circadian System in European Starlings and Japanese Quail
J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 1997; 12(5): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
G. Ravikumar, B. Senthilkumaran, P.D. Tewary, and A.K. Goel
Circadian Aspect of Photoperiodic Time Measurement in a Female House Sparrow, Passer domesticus
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1995; 10(4): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
T. S. Juss, V. M. King, V. Kumar, and B. K. Follett
Does Unusual Entrainment of the Circadian System Under T36h Photocycles Reduce the Critical Daylength for Photoperiodic Induction in Japanese Quail?
J Biol Rhythms, March 1, 1995; 10(1): 17 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
B. K. Follett and A. S. Pearce-Kelly
Photoperiodic Induction in Quail as a Function of the Period of the Light-Dark Cycle: Implications for Models of Time Measurement
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1991; 6(4): 331 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]