This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zhou, S. Articles by Hopkins, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhou, S. Articles by Hopkins, S. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Different Photoperiods Affect Proliferation of Lymphocytes but Not Expression of Cellular, Humoral, or Innate Immunity in Hamsters

North Western Injury Research Collaboration, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK

Felino R. A. Cagampang

J. Anne Stirland

Andrew S. I. Loudon

School of Biological Sciences, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Stephen J. Hopkins

North Western Injury Research Collaboration, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK shopkins{at}man.ac.uk

In seasonal mammals, photoperiod change is associated with a suite of alterations in physiology. It has recently been proposed that the immune response is one of the systems regulated by changes in photoperiod, although this hypothesis has not been rigorously challenged by assays of functional immune responses. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that photoperiod modulates immune responsiveness in Syrian (Mesocricetus auratus) and Siberian (Phodopus sungorus) hamsters. Consistent with previously reported data, short-day-housed (SD) animals exhibited a significant increase in lymph node cell (LNC) numbers and increased cellular proliferation in response to the polyclonal mitogen concanavalin Acompared to long-day-housed (LD) animals. In contrast, LNC numbers from intact or gonadectomized SD animals that had been sensitized with the antigen dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) exhibited a reduced ex vivo proliferative response and reduced production of interleukin-6 (IL-6) compared to LD animals. In vivo studies of the contact hypersensitivity response of animals that had previously been sensitized, and subsequently challenged, with DNFB were similar in SD and LD animals, as was the proliferative activity of LNC recovered from these animals. There were also no photoperiodic differences in the antidinitrophenyl antibody response of animals sensitized with DNFB, or the anti–sheep red blood cell (srbc) response of animals immunized with srbc. Furthermore, no differences could be detected in the activity of natural killer cells from spleens of LD and SD Siberian hamsters, or in lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 production by LD and SD Syrian hamsters in vivo. Thus, although photoperiod is able to influence factors regulating the gross number and non-antigen-specific proliferation of lymphocytes in seasonally breeding mammals, day length does not directly influence activation of an effective immune response. The authors conclude, therefore, that expression of the immune response is not directly modified or compromised by photoperiod in these seasonally breeding hamster species.

Key Words: seasonal • immunity • antibody • cell-mediated immunity • cytotoxicity • inflammation • cytokines

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 17, No. 5, 392-405 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/074873002237133


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?