This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Khammanivong, A. Articles by Nelson, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khammanivong, A. Articles by Nelson, D. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Light Pulses Suppress Responsiveness within the Mouse Photic Entrainment Pathway

Dwight E. Nelson

Department of Biology, University of St. Thomas, 2115 Summit Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA

We have characterized a decrease in photic responsiveness of the mammalian circadian entrainment pathway caused by light stimulation. Phase delays of the running-wheel activity rhythm were used to quantify the photic responsiveness of the circadian system in mice (C57BL/6J). In an initial experiment, the authors measured the responsiveness to single "saturating" light pulses ("white" fluorescent light; [.approxequal]1876 [.mu]W; 15 min). In two additional experiments, the authors measured responses to this stimulus at several time points following a saturating pulse at CT 14 or CT 16. Data from these experiments were analyzed in two manners. Experiment 2 was analyzed assuming that the phase of the circadian pacemaker was unchanged by an initial pulse, and Experiment 3 was analyzed assuming that the initial pulse induced an instantaneous phase delay. Results reveal a significant reduction in responsivity to light that persists for at least 2 h and possibly up to 4 h after the initial stimulus. Immediately after the stimulus, the responsiveness of the photic entrainment pathway was reduced to levels [.lessequal] 12% of normal. After 2 h, the responsiveness was [.lessequal] 42% of normal, and by 4 h, responsiveness had recovered to levels that were [.lessequal] 60% of normal (levels not statistically different from controls). By the following circadian cycle, responsiveness was more completely recovered, although the magnitude of some phase delays remained [.lessequal] 85% of normal. These major reductions in the magnitude of phase delays (and phase response curve amplitude) caused by saturating light pulses confound interpretations of two-pulse experiments designed to measure the rate of circadian phase delays. In addition, the time course for this reduced responsiveness may reflect the time course of cellular and molecular events that underlie light-induced resetting of the mammalian circadian pacemaker.

Key Words: phase shift • circadian • rhythm • biological clock • suprachiasmatic nuclei • SCN • activity rhythm

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 15, No. 5, 393-405 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/074873040001500505


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Comas, D.G.M. Beersma, K. Spoelstra, and S. Daan Circadian Response Reduction in Light and Response Restoration in Darkness: A "Skeleton" Light Pulse PRC Study in Mice (Mus musculus) J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 2007; 22(5): 432 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Drouyer, C. Rieux, R. A. Hut, and H. M. Cooper Responses of Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons to Light and Dark Adaptation: Relative Contributions of Melanopsin and Rod Cone Inputs J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9623 - 9631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Leise and H. Siegelmann Dynamics of a Multistage Circadian System J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2006; 21(4): 314 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Gronfier, K. P. Wright Jr., R. E. Kronauer, M. E. Jewett, and C. A. Czeisler Efficacy of a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses for delaying circadian phase in humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2004; 287(1): E174 - E181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Watanabe, T. Deboer, and J. H. Meijer Light-Induced Resetting of the Circadian Pacemaker: Quantitative Analysis of Transient versus Steady-State Phase Shifts J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 564 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]