This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Klerman, E. B. Articles by Kronauer, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klerman, E. B. Articles by Kronauer, R. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Linear Demasking Techniques Are Unreliable for Estimating the Circadian Phase of Ambulatory Temperature Data

Circadian, Neuroendocrine, and Sleep Disorders Section, Division of Endocrinology–Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

Younsun Lee

Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

Charles A. Czeisler

Circadian, Neuroendocrine, and Sleep Disorders Section, Division of Endocrinology–Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

Richard E. Kronauer

Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

Clinical investigators often use ambulatory temperature monitoring to assess the endogenous phase and amplitude of an individual's circadian pacemaker for diagnostic and research purposes. However, an individual's daily schedule includes changes in levels of activity, in posture, and in sleep-wake state, all of which are known to have masking or evoked effects on core body temperature (CBT) data. To compensate for or to correct these masking effects, many investigators have developed "demasking" techniques to extract the underlying circadian phase and amplitude data. However, the validity of these methods is uncertain. Therefore, the authors tested a variety of analytic methods on two different ambulatory data sets from two different studies in which the endogenous circadian pacemaker was not synchronized to the sleep-wake schedule. In both studies, circadian phase estimates calculated from CBT collected when each subject was ambulatory (i.e., free to perform usual daily activities) were compared to those calculated during the same study when the same subject's activities were controlled. In the first study, 24 sighted young and older subjects living on a 28-h scheduled "day" protocol were studied for approximately 21 to 25 cycles of 28-h each. In the second study, a blind man whose endogenous circadian rhythms were not synchronized to the 24-h day despite his maintenance of a regular 24-h sleep-wake schedule was studied for more than 80 consecutive 24-h days. During both studies, the relative phase of the endogenous (circadian) and evoked (scheduled activity-rest) components of the ambulatory temperature data changed progressively and relatively slowly, enabling analysis of the CBT rhythm at nearly all phase relationships between the two components. The analyses of the ambulatory temperature data demonstrate that the masking of the CBT rhythm evoked by changes in activity levels, posture, or sleep-wake state associated with the evoked schedule of activity and rest can significantly obscure the endogenous circadian component of the signal, the object of study. In addition, the masking effect of these evoked responses on temperature depends on the circadian phase at which they occur. These nonlinear interactions between circadian phase and sleep-wake schedule render ambulatory temperature data unreliable for the assessment of endogenous circadian phase. Even when proposed algebraic demasking techniques are used in an attempt to reveal the endogenous temperature rhythm, the phase estimates remain severely compromised.

Key Words: circadian rhythms • temperature • ambulatory data • masking • desynchrony • human • constant routine • demasking

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 14, No. 4, 260-274 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/074873099129000678


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. S. Padhye and S. K. Hanneman Cosinor Analysis for Temperature Time Series Data of Long Duration Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2007; 9(1): 30 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Duffy and K. P. Wright Jr. Entrainment of the Human Circadian System by Light J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 326 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Benloucif, M. J. Guico, K. J. Reid, L. F. Wolfe, M. L'Hermite-Baleriaux, and P. C. Zee Stability of Melatonin and Temperature as Circadian Phase Markers and Their Relation to Sleep Times in Humans J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 178 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. Barger, K. P. Wright Jr., R. J. Hughes, and C. A. Czeisler Daily exercise facilitates phase delays of circadian melatonin rhythm in very dim light Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): R1077 - R1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. S Khalsa, M. E Jewett, C. Cajochen, and C. A Czeisler A phase response curve to single bright light pulses in human subjects J. Physiol., June 15, 2003; 549(3): 945 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Duffy and D.-J. Dijk Getting Through to Circadian Oscillators: Why Use Constant Routines? J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2002; 17(1): 4 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D.-J. Dijk, D. F. Neri, J. K. Wyatt, J. M. Ronda, E. Riel, A. Ritz-De Cecco, R. J. Hughes, A. R. Elliott, G. K. Prisk, J. B. West, et al. Sleep, performance, circadian rhythms, and light-dark cycles during two space shuttle flights Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1647 - R1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]