Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biological Rhythms
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheper, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Pennartz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheper, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Pennartz, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Model of Molecular Circadian Clocks: Multiple Mechanisms for Phase Shifting and a Requirement for Strong Nonlinear Interactions

Tjeerd Olde Scheper

Don Klinkenberg

Jaap van Pelt

Cyriel Pennartz

Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam, Netherlands Institute for Brain Research, Meibergdreef 33, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

A fundamental question in the field of circadian rhythms concerns the biochemical and molecular nature of the oscillator. There is strong evidence that circadian oscillators are cell autonomous and rely on periodic gene expression. In Drosophila, Neurospora, Aplysia, and vertebrates, circadian oscillators are thought to be based on molecular autoregulatory loops composed of transcription, translation, and negative feedback by proteins on nuclear transcription. By studying a mathematical model of molecular clocks based on this general concept, the authors sought to determine which features such clocks must have to generate robust and stable oscillations and to allow entrainment by external stimuli such as light. The model produced circadian oscillations as an emergent property even though a time delay in protein synthesis and rate constants of the feedback loop were much shorter than 24 h. Along with the delay in protein production, strong nonlinear interactions in macromolecular synthesis and nuclear feedback appeared to be required for the model to show well-behaved oscillatory behavior. Realistic phase-shifting patterns induced by external stimuli could be achieved by multiple mechanisms—namely, up-and downward perturbations of protein or mRNA synthesis or degradation rates. The model makes testable predictions about interactions between clock elements and mechanisms of entrainment and may help to understand the functions of the intricate molecular interactions governing circadian rhythmogenesis.

Key Words: circadian rhythm • Drosophila • entrainment • Neurospora • nonlinearity • phase shift • suprachiasmatic nucleus • transcriptional regulation

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 14, No. 3, 213-220 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/074873099129000623


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
C. Gerard, D. Gonze, and A. Goldbeter
Dependence of the period on the rate of protein degradation in minimal models for circadian oscillations
Phil Trans R Soc A, December 13, 2009; 367(1908): 4665 - 4683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
D. G. M. Beersma
Why and How Do We Model Circadian Rhythms?
J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 304 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. C. Hendricks
Genetic Models in Applied Physiology: Invited Review: Sleeping flies don't lie: the use of Drosophila melanogaster to study sleep and circadian rhythms
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1660 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. A. Collett, N. Garceau, J. C. Dunlap, and J. J. Loros
Light and Clock Expression of the Neurospora Clock Gene frequency Is Differentially Driven by but Dependent on WHITE COLLAR-2
Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 149 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. M A Pennartz, R. Hamstra, and A. M S Geurtsen
Enhanced NMDA receptor activity in retinal inputs to the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus during the subjective night
J. Physiol., April 1, 2001; 532(1): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Suri, J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash
Two Novel doubletime Mutants Alter Circadian Properties and Eliminate the Delay between RNA and Protein in Drosophila
J. Neurosci., October 15, 2000; 20(20): 7547 - 7555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]