This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DeCoursey, P. J. Articles by Krulas, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeCoursey, P. J. Articles by Krulas, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Behavior of SCN-Lesioned Chipmunks in Natural Habitat: A Pilot Study

Jill R. Krulas

Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

The necessity of a circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), for survival was evaluated in a population of approximately 65 wild eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. The research involved over 3000 h of fieldwork between May 1995 and October 1997 on a study siteat Mountain Lake Biological Station, Virginia. The 28 chipmunks randomly designated as project animals included 10 SCN-lesioned chipmunks, 5 surgical controls (shamlesioned), and 13 intact controls. Visual observation, live trapping, and radio telemetric tracking were used to assess 6aspects of survival and reproduction. Upon release after surgery, every animal returned to its den site and was able to maintain its home territory. In warm months from May through October, all chipmunks were active above ground with a strictly day-active pattern. During the remainingcold months, they were normothermic but relatively torpid in their underground densfor extendedperiods of time. Short-term mortality for the initial 3 months included only a single intact control chipmunk; loss for the extended period from August 1995 to October 1996 was 40% for the SCN-lesioned animals, 0% for surgical controls, and 15.4% for the intact controls.Survival differences were not significant between surgical control and intact control groups but were significant ([.alpha] = .10) between SCN-lesioned and pooled control groups. Annual bodyweight patterns were similar for both groups. Most individuals in both SCN-lesioned and controlgroups were reproductively active in the spring and fall breeding periods. Lack of major differences may be attributable to the exceptionally favorable conditions for survival such as a veryabundant fallacorn crop, medium population size, and absence of heavy predation.

Key Words: chipmunks SCN-lesioned • arrhythmic • circadian ecology • adaptiveness • biological timing

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 13, No. 3, 229-244 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/074873098129000075


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. B. Majoy and P. D. Heideman Tau Differences between Short-Day Responsive and Short-Day Nonresponsive White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Do Not Affect Reproductive Photoresponsiveness J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2000; 15(6): 500 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Sheeba, V. K. Sharma, K. Shubha, M. K. Chandrashekaran, and A. Joshi The Effect of Different Light Regimes on Adult Lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster Is Partly Mediated through Reproductive Output J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 2000; 15(5): 380 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Hurd and M. R. Ralph The Significance of Circadian Organization for Longevity in the Golden Hamster J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 1998; 13(5): 430 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]