This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Prosser, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Prosser, R. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB GLUTAMIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In Vitro Circadian Rhythms of the Mammalian Suprachiasmatic Nuclei: Comparison of Multi-Unit and Single-Unit Neuronal Activity Recordings

Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, Walter's Life Sciences Building, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996

The circadian clock in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) expresses 24-h rhythms when isolated in vitro. Numerous studies have demonstrated that recordings of SCN single-unit neuronal activity (SUA), when expressed as a population rhythm, can be used to reliably estimate SCN circadian clock phase in vitro. The main disadvantage of this technique is its laborious nature. Thus, the present experiments were designed to investigate whether in vitro multi-unit neuronal activity (MUA) recordings from the SCN could reliably substitute for SUA recordings. The results show that an MUA rhythm can be recorded from rat SCN for 3 days in vitro but that this rhythm is extremely variable; times of peak MUA in control experiments vary by 7 to 9 h each day. They also show that several serotonergic agents previously shown to consistently advance the SUA rhythm 2 to 3 h when applied during the day induce apparent advances in the MUA rhythm in some experiments; in other cases, however, there appears to be a delay or no change in the phase of the rhythm. Thus, the mean change in time of peak seen after these treatments was an advance of about 1 h. Finally, the results show that glutamate and optic chiasm stimulation applied during early subjective night can induce apparent delays in the MUA rhythm. The results of these experiments were less variable, so that the overall effect was a delay in peak MUA of 2.5 to 3.5 h. Nevertheless, these experiments still exhibited more variability than that generally seen in SUA experiments. Taken together, these results indicate that MUA recordings of the SCN exhibit significantly more variability than do SUA recordings. The extent of this variability leads to the conclusion that, using the techniques and equipment outlined here, MUA recordings are not an adequate substitute for SUA recordings when trying to estimate the phase of the SCN circadian clock.

Key Words: circadian rhythms • brain slice • suprachiasmatic nuclei • single-unit activity • multi-unit activity • serotonin • glutamate

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 13, No. 1, 30-38 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/074873098128999899


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. F. Ruby, C. E. Hwang, C. Wessells, F. Fernandez, P. Zhang, R. Sapolsky, and H. C. Heller Hippocampal-dependent learning requires a functional circadian system PNAS, October 7, 2008; 105(40): 15593 - 15598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Itri and C. S. Colwell Regulation of Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission by Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nucleus J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1589 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Saeb-Parsy and R. E. J. Dyball Defined Cell Groups in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Have Different Day/Night Rhythms of Single-Unit Activity In Vivo J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2003; 18(1): 26 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Prosser, U. Rutishauser, G. Ungers, L. Fedorkova, and J. D. Glass Intrinsic Role of Polysialylated Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule in Photic Phase Resetting of the Mammalian Circadian Clock J. Neurosci., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 652 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jovanovska and R. A. Prosser Translational and Transcriptional Inhibitors Block Serotonergic Phase Advances of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Circadian Pacemaker In Vitro J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 2002; 17(2): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Watanabe, T. Deboer, and J. H. Meijer Light-Induced Resetting of the Circadian Pacemaker: Quantitative Analysis of Transient versus Steady-State Phase Shifts J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 564 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Prosser Glutamate Blocks Serotonergic Phase Advances of the Mammalian Circadian Pacemaker through AMPA and NMDA Receptors J. Neurosci., October 1, 2001; 21(19): 7815 - 7822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mrugala, P. Zlomanczuk, A. Jagota, and W. J. Schwartz Rhythmic multiunit neural activity in slices of hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus reflect prior photoperiod Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2000; 278(4): R987 - R994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]