Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Biological Rhythms
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Follett, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Follett, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Direct Comparison of Photoperiodic Time Measurement and the Circadian System in European Starlings and Japanese Quail

Verdun M. King

BBSRC Research Group on Photoperiodism and Reproduction, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1 UG, United Kingdom

George E. Bentley

BBSRC Research Group on Photoperiodism and Reproduction, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1 UG, United Kingdom

Brian K. Follett

BBSRC Research Group on Photoperiodism and Reproduction, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1 UG, United Kingdom

The extent to which circadian rhythms are involved in photoperiodic time measurement in quail is enigmatic, and earlier investigations have produced results consistent with an hourglass clock or one involving damped circadian oscillators. To address the problem further, the present authors carried out a direct comparison between the clocks in quail and those in starlings. Starlings possess strongly self-sustaining circadian oscillators. In Experiment 1, comparisons of testicular growth were made between the two species when birds were exposed to light:dark (LD) 6:30, LD 6:18, and LD 18:6. Starlings grew their testes rapidly under both LD 6:30 and LD 18:6, and they became photorefractory (under LD 6:18, the testes remained undeveloped). Quail grew their testes rapidly under LD 18:6 but did not do so under LD 6:30 or LD 6:18. In Experiment 2, entrainment of the activity rhythm under cycles of LD 6:30 was investigated by measuring the phase of the rhythm after release into constant darkness (DD). Birds were exposed to either 10 cycles or 11 cycles of LD 6:30 prior to DD. Starlings maintained their 24-h rhythmicity under LD 6:30 and always free ran from the phase of the subjective day By contrast, quail showed circadian activity approximately 24 h after every light pulse and free ran from the phase of the last light pulse received. In Experiment 3, phase response curves (PRCs) were generated to 6-h light pulses. The species were strikingly different; starlings produced a Type 1 PRC, whereas quail produced a Type 0 PRC. More important, in quail the 6-h light pulse had the same effect regardless of circadian time and in almost every case activity free ran from the position of the 6-h light pulse. The results in quail are consistent with the photoperiodic time measurement system being based on a weakly self-sustaining (rapidly damping) circadian system that is invariably reset by 6 h of light, whereas in starlings the pacemakers are strongly self-sustaining. The results support the notion that hourglass pacemakers can be highly damped circadian pacemakers.

Key Words: photoperiodic • resonance • circadian • hourglass • quail • starling • comparative

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 12, No. 5, 431-442 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/074873049701200505


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
B. D. Zivkovic, H. Underwood, C. T. Steele, and K. Edmonds
Formal Properties of the Circadian and Photoperiodic Systems of Japanese Quail: Phase Response Curve and Effects of T-Cycles
J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 1999; 14(5): 378 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
M. V. Nunes and D. Saunders
Photoperiodic Time Measurement in Insects: A Review of Clock Models
J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 1999; 14(2): 84 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
G. E. Bentley, A. R. Goldsmith, A. Dawson, C. Briggs, and M. Pemberton
Decreased Light Intensity Alters the Perception of Day Length by Male European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris)
J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 1998; 13(2): 148 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]