This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shimomura, K. Articles by Menaker, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shimomura, K. Articles by Menaker, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Photoperiodic Time Measurement in tau Mutant Hamsters

National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing and Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903

Dwight E. Nelson

National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing and Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903

Naomi L. Ihara

National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing and Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903

Michael Menaker

National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing and Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903

Photoperiodic regulation of testicular function was investigated in homozygous tau mutant hamsters; these animals have an innate circadian period of about 20 h. In 20-h light:dark (LD) cycles, the minimum photoperiod required to prevent testicular regression was between 10.0 and 11.5 h per 20-h cycle (equivalent to 12.0-13.8 circadian hours). This was proportionally similar to the minimum photoperiod necessary to prevent regression in wild-type hamsters maintained in 24-h LD cycles. To examine the shape of the photoperiodic photosensitivity curve in homozygous tau mutant hamsters, the authors measured the effects of different T cycles on testicular maintenance. Entrainment to LD 1:18.0 and LD 1:20.5 partially or completely prevented gonadal regression in homozygous tau mutant hamsters, but LD 1:19.4 did not prevent regression. When considered in terms of circadian time, the photoperiodic photosensitivity curve for homozygous tau mutant hamsters was similar to that described previously for wild-type hamsters. The results indicate that, as in wild-type hamsters, photoperiodic regulation of reproduction is regulated by circadian photosensitivity in homozygous tau mutant hamsters. Because tau mutant hamsters measure day length against a time base of 20 h, the circadian pacemaker that measures day length might be the same as that which generates circadian rhythmicity in locomotor activity. The authors' data leave open the question of whether the tau mutation has had effects on the control of reproduction that are not directly attributable to its effects on the period of the circadian oscillator.

Key Words: photoperiod • Syrian hamster • circadian rhythm • tau mutant • T cycles

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 12, No. 5, 423-430 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/074873049701200504


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J Paul, I. Zucker, and W. J Schwartz Tracking the seasons: the internal calendars of vertebrates Phil Trans R Soc B, January 27, 2008; 363(1490): 341 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.S.I. Loudon, Q.J. Meng, E.S. Maywood, D.A. Bechtold, R.P. Boot-Handford, and M.H. Hastings The Biology of the Circadian Ck1{epsilon} tau Mutation in Mice and Syrian Hamsters: A Tale of Two Species Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2007; 72(0): 261 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. Schwartz, H. O. de la Iglesia, P. Zlomanczuk, and H. Illnerova Encoding Le Quattro Stagioni within the Mammalian Brain: Photoperiodic Orchestration through the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2001; 16(4): 302 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Majoy and P. D. Heideman Tau Differences between Short-Day Responsive and Short-Day Nonresponsive White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Do Not Affect Reproductive Photoresponsiveness J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2000; 15(6): 500 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]