This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Skopik, S. D. Articles by Patel, N.G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Skopik, S. D. Articles by Patel, N.G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Insect Photoperiodism: Diversity of Results in Night-Break Experiments, Including Nonresponsiveness to Light

School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

Makio Takeda

School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

William J. Cain

School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716

N.G. Patel

E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Agricultural Chemicals Department, Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19898

Three night-break experiment protocols were utilized in an attempt to help clarify the role of the circadian system in photoperiodic time measurement in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Larvae raised in a light-dark (LD) cycle consisting of 12 hr of light alternating with 12 hr of darkness (LD 12:12), at a constant temperature of 30°C, enter a state of arrested growth and development known as diapause (Takeda and Skopik, 1985). In the present research (Experiment 1), the induction of diapause was prevented by 1-hr light pulses that systematically scanned the dark phase of LD 12:12. Thus, the importance of 12 hr of uninterrupted darkness for maximal induction of diapause is stressed. The same experimental protocol applied to larvae already in diapause (Experiment 2), however, resulted in a bimodal curve of diapause termination. Although this result is consistent with the proposition that a nonperiodic hourglass timer underlies this event (Skopik and Takeda, 1986), it does not rule out the circadian system.

Like LD 12:12, a thermoperiod in constant darkness (12 hr at 4°C alternating with 12 hr at 25°C) also induces diapause. Scanning such a thermoperiod with 1-hr light pulses, however, resulted in only a small effect (reduction of diapause) when light fell in the early to middle part of the warm phase (Experiment 3). Thus, the time-measuring system, under these exper imental conditions, showed only a weak response to light. This unexpected result is discussed with respect to Experiment 1 and two general models that have been proposed to account for photoperiodic time measurement in insects.

Journal of Biological Rhythms, Vol. 1, No. 3, 243-249 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/074873048600100306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.S. Koveos, A. Kroon, and A. Veerman The Same Photoperiodic Clock May Control Induction and Maintenance of Diapause in the Spider Mite Tetranchus urticae J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 265 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]